Showing posts with label Law and Robots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law and Robots. Show all posts

August 1, 2024

Call For Submissions: Open Philosophy: Sensuality and Robots

From Michał Kowalczyk, Assistant Editor, De Gruyter:
REMINDER: CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS for a topical issue of Open Philosophy

 

SENSUALITY AND ROBOTS: AN AESTHETIC APPROACH TO HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS

 

Open Philosophy (https://www.degruyter.com/opphil) invites submissions for the topical issue "Sensuality and Robots: An Aesthetic Approach to Human-Robot Interactions," edited by Adrià Harillo Pla.

 

DESCRIPTION

 

Can robots be sensual? In our era of technological advancements, the once clear demarcation between humans and machines is becoming increasingly blurred. As robotics and artificial intelligence continue to evolve, there is a remarkable confluence of situations that beckons us to ponder the profound implications of human-robot interactions. Sexual robots, or partners like Replika, are just an example. This edited issue puts on the table the relationship between aesthetics and philosophy, seeking to understand the intricate interplay of sensuality and robots.

 

Welcoming authors whose are informed by various philosophical approaches, which include, but are not limited to, Aesthetics, Philosophy of Time, Ethics, and Philosophy of Technology, this issue navigates the evolving landscape of human-robot relationships. Approaches from the Sociology of Expectations, Science and Technology Studies, or Psychology, are also welcome.

 

This issue will shed light into the concept of “sensuality” as a multi-faceted aesthetic, and creative experience that encompasses not only physical sensations, but also emotional and psychological. By probing the boundaries of what it means to be sensual, this issue intends to unravel the enigmatic allure of machines that simulate human-like qualities, maybe sometimes even transcending human capacities. The topical issue aspires to ignite a lively and thoughtful discussion on the present and future of sensuality and robots. By embracing this novel form of human-machine interaction, it opens the door to a fascinating journey that promises to reshape the boundaries of sensuality, aesthetics, eroticism, and the human experience in an ever-evolving technological world.

 

Contributions may address questions such as: ● Can a robot be sensual? ● In the case of sexual robots, is sensuality a condition of necessity, sufficiency, or possibility for its expected functionality? ● Can mechanisms of security affect not only the usability of a robot, but also its sensuality? ● Is there space for a “Robo-Eroticism” subdiscipline? ● How could a robot be sensual? ● What is the role of creativity in achieving sensual human-robot interactions? Authors publishing their articles in the special issue will benefit from: · transparent, comprehensive and fast peer review, · efficient route to fast-track publication and full advantage of De Gruyter's e-technology. Because Open Philosophy is published under an Open Access model, as a rule, publication costs should be covered by so-called Article Publishing Charges (APC), paid by authors, their affiliated institutions, funders, or sponsors. Authors without access to publishing funds are encouraged to discuss potential discounts or waivers with Managing Editor of the journal Katarzyna Tempczyk (katarzyna.tempczyk@degruyter.com) before submitting their manuscripts.

 

HOW TO SUBMIT Submissions will be collected from September 1 to September 30, 2024. To submit an article for the special issue of Open Philosophy, authors are asked to access the online submission system at: http://www.editorialmanager.com/opphil/

 

Please choose as article type: Sensual Robots

 

Before submission the authors should carefully read over the Instruction for Authors, available at: https://www.degruyter.com/publication/journal_key/OPPHIL/downloadAsset/OPPHIL_Instruction%20for%20Authors.pdf

 

All contributions will undergo critical review before being accepted for publication.

 

Further questions about this thematic issue can be addressed to Adrià Harillo Pla at adria.harillo@gmail.com.

 

In case of technical problems with submission, please contact AssistantManagingEditor@degruyter.com

 

Find us on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DGOpenPhilosophy

May 14, 2018

Corcos on Some Popular Culture Images of AI In Humanity's Courtroom @LSULawCenter @SavLawRev

Christine A. Corcos, Louisiana State University Law Center, is publishing ‘I Am the Master’: Some Popular Culture Images of AI in Humanity’s Courtroom in the Savannah Law Review (2018), as part of the symposium Rise of the Automatons. Here is the abstract.
Both serious literature and popular culture are flooding us with discussions of the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). As we note the rise of the subject of robot law and particularly the question of whether AI could possibly become sentient we begin to take seriously concerns about the regulation of the use of robots and the possibility that AI might pose a threat to the physical safety and privacy of human beings. In particular, we are beginning to wonder how we might control this new technology, which seems both more intelligent and more powerful than human beings. Suppose unethical or negligent programmers create situations in which AI escapes human controls and thus contravenes human norms or rules? Can we bring that AI to account? Ought we to do so, particularly if that AI is sentient or approaches sentience? At first, we might think that the answer should be “yes,” because after all we have created the AI and we should continue to control it. But the question is, I would submit, more complicated. We have created computers and robots as useful tools, but we have continued to develop them as far more — as devices that far outstrip our own capacities to decipher the mysteries of the Universe. If we deliberately endow them with characteristics that mimic our own, if they develop those independently, or develop others by analogy allowing them to function in ways that mirror human activities, can we continue to insist that we should treat them as property and that they should do our bidding? If at some point, they make some demand for the right not to follow commands that we issue, for whatever reason, ought we to ignore that demand? Novelists, filmmakers, and other artists who create popular culture have already considered this question for decades, if not centuries. In this Article, I discuss some of the ways in which some of them have thought about these issues and the insights they have had, which could guide us as we move through this important area.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.

See other articles in this symposium:  Brian L. Frye, The Lion, the Bat, & the Thermostat,  Philip Segal, Legal Jobs in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Moving From Today's Limited Universe of Data Toward the Great Beyond.

April 26, 2017

Reminder: Call For Papers, AALS Section of Law and the Humanities Panel on Robots and AI in the Humanities, 2018 Annual Meeting

 Reminder:
 
Call for papers for an AALS Section of Law and the Humanities panel at the 2018 Annual Meeting, San Diego, January 3-January 6, 2018,  on the theme of the image of robots and AI in the humanities, communication, film, tv, art, commercials, philosophy, and related disciplines. Should robots and AI have rights? If so what rights? 

Intrigued by the image of robots in film? Have you thought about what norms or law should govern the behavior of AI in society? Input your thoughts into a laptop, or on paper,  or get an android to co-author something with you and send your expression of interest, affiliation, and a short description (100-250 words) of  your proposed paper by May 15, 2017 to

Christine Corcos (christine.corcos@law.lsu.edu) at LSU Law Center. See you in San Diego!



April 6, 2017

Call For Papers: AALS Section of Law and Humanities Panel on AI/Robots, Law, and the Humanities

Call for papers for an AALS Section of Law and the Humanities panel at the 2018 Annual Meeting, San Diego, January 3-January 6, 2018,  on the theme of the image of robots and AI in the humanities, communication, film, tv, art, commercials, philosophy, and related disciplines. Should robots and AI have rights? If so what rights? 

Please send expressions of interest, your affiliation, and a short description (100-250 words) of the proposed paper by May 15, 2017 to

Christine Corcos (christine.corcos@law.lsu.edu)


Thank you.


September 18, 2016

For Your Consideration: Ars Technica @arstechnica Explains Mr. Robot

ICYMI: Ars Technica @arstechnica (with writers such as Nathan Mattise and Jonathan M. Gitlin) has been discussing the series Mr. Robot @whoismrrobot (USA Network) and its themes to law, politics, and pop culture since it premiered. The writers tackle these issues with gusto, and the pieces are informative and lively. Here are links to some essays.

Mr. Robot's Attention To Detail Even Extends To Campy, '80s Horror Flicks

Mr. Robot's First Season Was a Compelling Descent Into Madness

Mr. Robot's Tech Guru

You can also listen to podcasts about the show and its ins and outs: General link

Decrypted, episode 1 (season 2)