The new legal realist approach to international law builds from a jurisprudential tradition that asks how actors use and apply law in order to understand how law obtains meaning, is practiced, and changes over time. The article addresses the jurisprudential roots of the new legal realism, its core attributes, and six important components in the current transnational context. In the pragmatist tradition, the new legal realism is both empirical and problem-centered, attending to both context and legal normativity. What is new is the rise of transnational activity that gives rise to an enlarged scope of transnational problem solving through international law in radically new ways across areas of law, and the growth of empirical study of these phenomena. The article concludes by addressing the potential risks of the new legal realist approach in terms of scientism and relativism, and it responds to them.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
May 18, 2015
The New Legal Realist Approach To International Law
Gregory Shaffer, University of California, Irvine, School of Law, has published The New Legal Realist Approach to International Law at 28 Leiden Journal of International Law 189 (2015) as part of a symposium on new legal realism. Here is the abstract.
May 14, 2015
The French Social Justice Movement Over Time and Current Advocacy For Islam
Riaz Tejani, University of Illinois, Springfield, Department of Legal Studies, is publishing 'A Logic of Camps': French Antiracism as Competitive Nationalism in volume 38 of the Political and Legal Anthropology Review (2015). Here is the abstract.
Download the text of the Article from SSRN at the link.
As the Charlie Hebdo and Copenhagen attacks starkly remind us, European multicultural policy continues to falter over the growth of public Islam. But long before these events, tension between competing visions of citizenship and nationhood had weakened the very civil society organizations that could shape such policy. In France, where non-governmental organizations had labored against discrimination for over a century, this conflict led to profound disaffection within the nation’s powerful antiracism movement. Drawing from more than two years of ethnographic fieldwork among French antiracist NGOs, this article examines that disaffection among activists whose work in the name of cultural outsiders simultaneously served to rememorialize historic national traumas from the Dreyfus Affair to Algeria. Revealing a new despondency over sociolegal advocacy for Islam, some decried "infiltration" of communitarian voices into their erstwhile republican movement while others, under increasing pressure to adopt an emergent pluralist vision, equated this new model with foreignness itself. The resulting "crisis of antiracism" saw competitive reassertions of nationhood in the face of countervailing state discourses of European postnationalism. If writings on French multiculturalism to date have focused on Islamic piety and urban youth deviance, this article examines the significant impact these have had on France’s preeminent social justice movement.
Download the text of the Article from SSRN at the link.
May 13, 2015
The Windmills In His Mind: Moot Court Proceeding Examines Don Quixote's Competency
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided (as Chief Justice) over the Supreme Court of La Mancha in a moot court proceeding at the Shakespeare Theatre Company on May 11. Other justices and judges involved included Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, Chief Judge Merrick Garland and Judge Patricia Millett of the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and Judge Amy Berman Jackson
of the U.S. District Court of Appeals. Thomas Goldstein (Goldstein Russell) represented Don Quixote; Carter Phillips (Sidley Austin) argued for the interests of the Family Court of La Mancha and Don Quixote's niece Antonia, who wished to be named his guardian.
The parties advocated for and against the competency of one Don Quixote de la Mancha. The issue: is he so out of touch with reality that he needs a court-appointed guardian? Justice Ginsburg ultimately decided "no," because dreamers like him allow civilization to progress. Prior moot courts put on by the Shakespeare Theatre Company's Bard Association have included events inspired by Shakespeare's Henry V and Measure for Measure, and Oscar Wilde's An Ideal Husband. More here.
More about May 11th's event here from Tony Mauro at the Blog of Legal Times.
More about May 11th's event here from Tony Mauro at the Blog of Legal Times.
Celebrating Shakespeare
A little light entertainment from Dominique Goy-Blanquet for a Shakespearean anniversary here. More at the website here: ShakespeareAnniversary.org.
Business Models, Law, and the Classical Roman Market
Benito Arruñada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, has published The Institutions of Roman Markets as Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Economics and Business Working Paper Series 1471. Here is the abstract.
I analyze the basis of the market economy in classical Rome, from the perspective of personal-versus-impersonal exchange and focusing on the role of the state in providing market-enabling institutions. I start by reviewing the central conflict in all exchanges between those holding and those acquiring property rights, and how solving it requires reducing information asymmetry without endangering the security of property. Relying on a model of the social choice of institutions, I identify the demand and supply factors driving the institutional choices made by the Romans, and examine the economic circumstances that influenced these factors in the classical period of Roman law. Comparing the predictions of the model with the main solutions used by Roman law in the areas of property, business exchange and the enforcement of personal obligations allows me to propose alternative interpretations for some salient institutions that have been subject to controversy in the literature, and to conclude with an overall positive assessment of the market-enabling role of the Roman state.Download the paper from SSRN at the link.
Moral Responsibility and Criminal Sanctions
Ken Levy, Louisiana State University Law Center, is publishing Does Situationism Excuse? The Implications of Situationism for Moral Responsibility and Criminal Responsibility in volume 68 of the Arkansas Law Review (2015). Here is the abstract.
In this Article, I will argue that a person may be deserving of criminal punishment even in certain situations where she is not necessarily morally responsible for her criminal act. What these situations share in common are two things: (a) the psychological factors that motivate the individual’s behavior are environmentally determined and (b) her crime is serious, making her less eligible for sympathy and therefore less likely to be acquitted.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
To get to this conclusion, I will proceed in four steps. In Part II, I will offer the first two of these steps. First, I will argue that our foundational assumption that moral responsibility is necessary for just blame and punishment is not self-evident and is actually rather difficult to explain and justify. Second, I will offer an explanation and justification that appeals to our moral psychology. Specifically, I will argue that we subscribe to this assumption (that moral responsibility is necessary for just blame and punishment) ultimately because we sympathize with agents who lack responsibility for their actions.
Third, in Part IV, I aim to show that even if moral responsibility is not conceptually — only “emotionally” — necessary for just blame and punishment, the traditionally recognized criminal excuses (automatism, duress, entrapment, hypnosis, infancy, insanity, involuntary intoxication, mistake of fact, and mistake of law) are not at risk because, contrary to popular wisdom, they do not really rely on this assumption to begin with. Instead, they stand less for the metaphysical proposition that we should refrain from blaming and punishing the non-responsible and more for the normative/ethical proposition that we should refrain from blaming and punishing those whom we cannot reasonably expect to have acted better. I will further argue that the latter proposition does not necessarily reduce to the former.
Fourth, once I have defended my account of the excuses, I will question in Parts V and VI the increasingly popular notion that we should add certain conditions or circumstances to the list of recognized excuses. I will focus on one in particular — the psychological theory of “situationism” — and will argue that, despite its initial plausibility, it should be kept off the list. While situationism arguably does negate moral responsibility, it does not negate criminal responsibility.
Of course, this is a controversial point. Criminal responsibility is almost universally thought to require moral responsibility. But in a previous article, "Dangerous Psychopaths: Criminally Responsible But Not Morally Responsible, Subject to Criminal Punishment And to Preventive Detention," 48 San Diego L. Rev. 1299 (2011), I used personality psychology to drive a wedge between the two. In this article, I will use the opposite end of the psychological spectrum — social psychology — to drive the same important wedge.
ABA Announces Winners of 2015 Silver Gavel Awards
The American Bar Association has announced the winners of the 2015 Silver Gavel Awards. Here's the text of its press release.
The link to the ABA webpage also lists winners of Silver Gavel honorable mentions.WASHINGTON, May 13, 2015 — The American Bar Association announced today its selections for the 2015 Silver Gavel Awards for Media and the Arts, which recognize outstanding work in media and the arts that fosters the American public’s understanding of law and the legal system. This is the ABA’s highest honor in recognition of this purpose.
The winners are:
- “Burning Down the House: The End of Juvenile Prison,” a book that shines a harsh light on America’s juvenile prisons and argues that state-run detention centers should be abolished
- “The Case Against 8,” a behind-the-scenes documentary that looks at the historic federal court case to overturn Prop 8, California’s ban on same-sex marriage
- “Till Death Do Us Part,” an investigative newspaper series that examines South Carolina’s “silent epidemic” of domestic violence and proposes concrete solutions to reduce the state’s extraordinarily high rate of women killed by men
- “Serial: Season One,” a radio podcast that probes a 2000 murder trial in Baltimore to tell a larger story of the realities of criminal prosecution
The awards ceremony will take place July 21 at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. ABA President William Hubbard will present the Silver Gavel Awards to honorees.
The ABA will present four Silver Gavels and four honorable mentions from 168 entries received in all eligible categories: books, commentary, documentaries, drama and literature, magazines, newspapers, radio, television and other media.
Selection criteria include: how the entry addresses the Gavel Awards’ purpose and objectives; educational value of legal information; impact on, or outreach to, the public; thoroughness and accuracy in presentation of issues; creativity and originality in approach to subject matter and effectiveness of presentation; and demonstrated technical skill in the entry’s production.
“The winners of 2015 Gavel Awards for Media and the Arts are the result of a rigorous and selective review by the American Bar Association,” said Cory M. Amron, chair of the ABA Standing Committee on Gavel Awards. “We congratulate all of the awardees for their outstanding efforts to foster the American public’s understanding of law and legal institutions.”
The association has presented these awards annually since 1958. The 18-member ABA Standing Committee on Gavel Awards makes final award decisions.
U. S. Privacy Law After One Hundred Twenty Years
Robert Sprague, University of Wyoming, College of Business, Kevin Grauberger, University of Wyoming, and Nicole Barberis, Bloomberg LP, have published One Hundred Twenty Years of U.S. Privacy Law Scholarship: A Latent Semantic Analysis. Here is the abstract.
This paper reports results from a research project aimed at identifying fundamental privacy law principles derived from the writings of legal scholars and commentators using probabilistic topic modeling, which is comprised of a suite of algorithms that attempt to discover hidden thematic structures in large archives of documents. Topic modeling algorithms are statistical methods that analyze the words of texts to discover topics (themes) contained within, how those topics are connected to each other, and how they change over time. A latent Dirichlet allocation process, which identifies sets of terms that more tightly co-occur, is incorporated into the topic modeling analysis to identify words most closely associated with each identified topic. The latent Dirichlet allocation therefore provides insight into the context in which each identified topic occurs. Our analysis reveals that privacy law in the United States comports most closely with the Georgia Supreme Court’s 1905 description of privacy from the seminal case Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Company: “the right of a person to be secure from invasion by the [government or] public into matters of a private nature.”Download the paper from SSRN at the link.
May 12, 2015
A Lawyer In Natchez
Bill Sheehan of the Washington Post reviews Greg Iles' new novel The Bone Tree here. The book, the second in a trilogy about lawyer/novelist Penn Cage, explores violent events linked to Mississippi's past.
Mr. Iles' novel Natchez Burning, the first novel in the trilogy, is slated for TV; more here from Deadline.com.
Mr. Iles' novel Natchez Burning, the first novel in the trilogy, is slated for TV; more here from Deadline.com.
May 11, 2015
Law, Language, and Culture In the European Union
New from Ashgate: Language and Culture in EU Law: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Susan Sarcevic, ed.; 2015) (Law, Language, and Communication). Here is a description of the contents from the publisher's website.
Written by distinguished legal and linguistic scholars and practitioners from the EU institutions, the contributions in this volume provide multidisciplinary perspectives on the vital role of language and culture as key forces shaping the dynamics of EU law. The broad spectrum of topics sheds light on major Europeanization processes at work: the gradual creation of a neutralized EU legal language with uniform concepts, for example, in the DCFR and CESL, and the emergence of a European legal culture. The main focus is on EU multilingual lawmaking, with special emphasis on problems of legal translation and term formation in the multilingual and multicultural European context, including comparative law aspects and an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of translating from a lingua franca. Of equal importance are issues relating to the multilingual interpretation of EU legislation and case law by the national courts and interpretative techniques of the CJEU, as well as the viability of the autonomy of EU legal concepts and the need for the professionalization of court interpreters Union-wide in response to Directive 2010/64/EU. Offering a good mix of theory and practice, this book is intended for scholars, practitioners and students with a special interest in the legal-linguistic aspects of EU law and their impact on old and new Member States and candidate countries as well.
Have Some Comics With Your Copyright Law
Need an amusing and interesting way to explain copyright law? Or wish you understood it better yourself? Check out Bound By Law? (Tales From the Public Domain) by Keith Aoki, James Boyle, and Jennifer Jenkins. It's also available in a flash animation here and in translations into French, Portuguese and Italian.
The Treatment of the Law of Evidence in Legal and Political Contexts
Ronald J. Allen, Northwestern University Law School, is publishing A Note to My Philosophical Friends About Expertise and Legal Systems in Humana-Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies (forthcoming). Here is the abstract.
This brief essay explores how understanding the treatment of expert evidence requires engaging with its legal and political contexts, and not just focusing on its epistemological aspects. Although the law of evidence and thus its treatment of experts is significantly informed by epistemological considerations, it is also informed by concerns over the organization of trials, larger issues of intelligent governance, social concerns, and enforcement issues. These five aspects to the law of evidence give rise to principles to guide the explicit structuring of the law of evidence that are identified here as well. This complexity helps to explain why the central issue of expert testimony is not the epistemological one of knowledge and belief but instead the conflict between educational and deferential modes of trial.Download the essay from SSRN at the link.
"The Wire" In Law School Courses
Andrea Dennis, University of Georgia Law School, has published Teaching The Wire: Crime, Evidence and Kids at 64 Journal of Legal Education 111 (2014). Here is the abstract.
I have a confession: I have only watched Season 1 of The Wire, and it has been many years since I did that. Thus, both my knowledge and pedagogical use of the show are limited. What explanation can I offer for my failings? I am a Maryland native with family who resides in Baltimore City, or Charm City as it is affectionately called. I worked for several years as an assistant federal public defender in Baltimore City. Over time, I have seen the city evolve, and I have seen it chew up and spit out many good people and some not so good people. So, in the past, I told students who asked whether I had ever seen The Wire: “Why should I watch a fictional version of what I (painfully) experienced as reality?” Although it took many years after the series ended, I did eventually break down and watch Season 1. In doing so, I discovered that the show is an ideal source for exploration of issues arising in three courses I teach. To date, I have used portions of Season 1 as platforms for assessing students’ comprehension of the materials in these courses.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
May 10, 2015
Lannisters, Starks, and Fantasy Football
Joe Berkowitz of Fast Company highlights this meshing of the worlds of Game of Thrones and the NFL. Examine Dave Rappaccio's Westeros Fantasy Football League more closely here at Kissing Suzy Kolber. More GoT fun here from FC writer Dan Solomon, who discusses how Tim Proby gave all 32 of the NFL teams Westeros themes.
If you need even for your Game of Thrones fix, check out how the Getty is linking the show with medieval art here, (no football, though).
If you need even for your Game of Thrones fix, check out how the Getty is linking the show with medieval art here, (no football, though).
May 8, 2015
Of Hedgehogs, Foxes, and Theories
Ronen Perry, University of Haifa Faculty of Law; University of Oxford Faculty of Law, is publishing Pluralistic Legal Theories: In Search of a Common Denominator in volume 90 of the Tulane Law Review (2015). Here is the abstract.
This Essay embarks on a meta-theoretical project to provide a unifying philosophical framework for pluralistic legal theories. Put differently, it seeks to identify a structural common denominator for all pluralistic theories of law, with a particular emphasis on private law (torts and contracts). The Essay first rejects the notion of complementarity coined by Nobel Prize laureate Niels Bohr, and applied to legal theory by Izhak Englard. It then advocates the allegedly Thomist aphorism hominem unius libri timeo (“I fear the man of a single book”), and connects it to Isaiah Berlin’s renowned distinction between the hedgehog and the fox.Download the essay from SSRN at the link.
May 7, 2015
Religious Courts and Women's Equality
Marie Ashe, Suffolk University Law School, and Anissa Helie, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY, have published Realities of Religio-Legalism: Religious Courts and Women's Rights in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States at 20 U. Cal.-Davis J. International Law & Policy 139 (2014). Here is the abstract.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.
Religio-legalism – the enforcement of religious law by specifically-religious courts that are tolerated or endorsed by civil government – has long operated against women’s interests in liberty and equality. In the 21st century, religious tribunals – Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, and Muslim – operate throughout the world. Almost all are male-dominated, patriarchal, and sex-discriminatory. Harms to women produced by Muslim or sharia courts have come into focus in recent years, but present realities of religio-legalism operating through Christian and Jewish – as well as Muslim – religious courts in Western nations have been under-examined. This essay documents controversies concerning sharia-courts that have arisen in Canada and in the United Kingdom during the past decade and also looks at concurrent developments relating to sharia and to other-than-Muslim religious courts in the US.
Religious courts – Christian, Jewish, and Muslim – have in common that they assert original or exclusive jurisdiction over certain matters. In calls for “official recognition” of sharia courts, proponents have advanced a religious-equality argument, claiming that denial of that status to Muslim tribunals would violate the governmental obligation to avoid discrimination among religions. At the same time, sharia-related controversy has raised sharply the question about the implications for women’s liberty and equality rights that are produced by governmental accommodations of the religious-equality and religious-liberty interests asserted by all religious entities enjoying governmental recognition.
While recognizing the legitimacy and weight of the complaint against inequitable treatment of religions, we argue here that whenever governmental action to “resolve” sharia-related conflict adopts the avoidance of discrimination among religions as its single goal and therefore expands its “official recognition” to include additional religious courts, it will have the effect of enlarging religions’ power and at the same time exacerbating harms to women.
Referencing feminist writings that have documented the global spread of religious fundamentalisms from the 1990s to the present and that have exposed capitulations of liberalism to those fundamentalisms, we call for reconceptualization of the law-religion-women nexus. We urge recognition that governmental goals of equitable treatment of religions and protection of women’s rights will together be served not by expansions of governmental engagements with religion, but by retrenchment from religio-legalism. Thus, we urge, in policy and in law, clear prioritization of the protection of women’s rights and concurrent retreat from the formal recognition of all religious courts and of civil-law enforcement of the orders of any such bodies.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.
May 6, 2015
Fall 2015 Legal Pilots, You're Up!
The Hollywood Reporter notes that the fall 2015 season might bring us new legal series. Nearly every network has some kind of legal show. ABC is looking at a pilot called The Adversaries, CBS at Doubt (a lawyer gets involved with her client--have we seen this plot before?), Fox at a comedy called The Grinder (Rob Lowe as a TV lawyer who thinks he's a real lawyer: I suppose this show is the playing out of the line "I'm not a real...but I've played one on TV"), NBC at Game of Silence (David Lyons as an ambitious young lawyer with secrets). More here.
Abraham Lincoln As an Attorney
Roger D. Billings, Jr., Northern Kentucky University Salmon P. Chase College of Law, is publishing Abraham Lincoln and the Duty of Zealous Representation: The Matson Slave Case in the Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal. Here is the abstract.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.
“Abraham Lincoln, lawyer for the slave-owner, Robert Matson,” does fit the description of a Great Emancipator. The fact remains that he did work zealously for Matson. This article argues that the Matson case does not contradict Lincoln’s well-known reputation for hatred of slavery. Rather, in that case he acted in the tradition of John Adams who risked his reputation to represent the British soldiers who perpetrated the Boston Massacre.
The article first describes Lincoln’s participation in the Matson case, including an analysis of the habeas corpus hearing that preceded it. It continues with a description of Lincoln’s skills as a trial lawyer. It then discusses the antebellum ethical rule enunciated by Lord Brougham and other leading scholars who said that zealous advocacy was required for even the most odious clients. The article concludes that Lincoln was following this rule and that the rule is still valid today. It maintains that Lincoln was acting on the highest level of professionalism in the sole case where he represented a slave owner.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.
Cry, "Havoc"' and Let Slip the Dogs of War
Roger Kimball reviewing Barry Strauss's new book The Death of Caesar and unintended consequences here, for the New Criterion.
An Alternative View of the Author As Professional in Culture Production
Shun-Ling Chen, Academia Sinica Law Institution, is publishing Exposing Professionalism in United States Copyright Law: The Disenfranchised Lay Public in a Semiotic Democracy in volume 49 of the University of San Francisco Law Review (2015). Here is the abstract.
Cross posted at Media Law Prof Blog here.
The article contributes to the contemporary critique of copyright law in two ways. First: existing literature focuses on the images of the author as a "romantic genius" or as a property owner. This paper points out that there is a third image of the author in copyright law – that of an "expert author". By exposing how professionalism is ingrained in copyright law's rhetoric of progress, quality work and justifiable economic compensation, the paper shows that the institution of copyright redistributes not merely material resources, but also symbolic resources in society (i.e. prestige, credibility, and power in cultural production). Secondly, the exposure of professionalism enables us to understand a tactic the incumbent copyright industry uses to discredit collaborative projects and to continue championing a restrictive copyright regime. Exposing professionalism helps to re-orient knowledge and power in culture production, and is therefore key to a robust semiotic democracy.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
Cross posted at Media Law Prof Blog here.
Explaining Free Will Using Physics
More on what profs (including law profs) seem like to students, from Dinosaur Comics.
Tip of the beret to Professor Steven Jamar, Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice, Howard University.
Tip of the beret to Professor Steven Jamar, Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice, Howard University.
May 5, 2015
Detecting Murder
Martin Edwards has published The Golden Age of Murder (Harper Collins, 2015), available both in hardcover and as a e-book. Here's a description of the contents from the publisher's website.
A real-life detective story, investigating how Agatha Christie and colleagues in a mysterious literary club transformed crime fiction, writing books casting new light on unsolved murders whilst hiding clues to their authors’ darkest secrets.
Another interesting book about a group that does somewhat the same thing is Michael Capuzzo's The Murder Room (Gotham, 2011), about the Vidocq Society, named for Eugene Francois Vidocq, the criminal turned detective who founded the Surete, France's first expert official detective bureau.
The Sense of Injustice and the Origins of Terrorism
Michael Shermer on capuchin monkeys, scientists, the sense of injustice, and terrorism, here, for Scientific American.
2 Broke Girls and the Statutory Rape Question
On the May 4, 2015 episode of "2 Broke Girls," Nash's mother accuses Max of having sex with her "underaged" son, and nearly everyone in the episode, including Max and Caroline, seems to agree that Max has some kind of legal issue. However, there's only one problem with this analysis of the situation. As the mother admits, Nash is "just now 18." Even if Max and Nash began their affair when Nash was seventeen, under New York state law, their affair is perfectly legal. The authorities cannot arrest Max for statutory rape. Here are the relevant parts of the NY statute.
New York Penal Law
§ 130.35 Rape in the first degree.
A person is guilty of rape in the first degree when he or she engages
in sexual intercourse with another person:
1. By forcible compulsion; or
2. Who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless;
or
3. Who is less than eleven years old; or
4. Who is less than thirteen years old and the actor is eighteen years
old or more.
Rape in the first degree is a class B felony.
130.30 Rape in the second degree.
A person is guilty of rape in the second degree when:
1. being eighteen years old or more, he or she engages in sexual
intercourse with another person less than fifteen years old; or
2. he or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person who is
incapable of consent by reason of being mentally disabled or mentally
incapacitated.
It shall be an affirmative defense to the crime of rape in the second
degree as defined in subdivision one of this section that the defendant
was less than four years older than the victim at the time of the act.
S 130.25 Rape in the third degree.
A person is guilty of rape in the third degree when:
1. He or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person who is
incapable of consent by reason of some factor other than being less than
seventeen years old;
2. Being twenty-one years old or more, he or she engages in sexual
intercourse with another person less than seventeen years old; or
3. He or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person without
such person`s consent where such lack of consent is by reason of some
factor other than incapacity to consent.
Rape in the third degree is a class E felony.
Similarly, none of the provisions covering criminal sexual conduct apply either. We have no reason to believe that Nash does not consent to the relationship and he is of age (he was seventeen and is now eighteen). Nor can his mother object to his working as a model. He cannot void his modeling contract, since he seems to have entered into it as an adult (although it's not clear from the episode when he turned eighteen; if it was after he entered in the contract with the agency, he would need to enter into another contract).
Max and Caroline's continuing problem, however, is that they still don't have a talent agent's license; thus, they cannot represent Nash.
New York Penal Law
§ 130.35 Rape in the first degree.
A person is guilty of rape in the first degree when he or she engages
in sexual intercourse with another person:
1. By forcible compulsion; or
2. Who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless;
or
3. Who is less than eleven years old; or
4. Who is less than thirteen years old and the actor is eighteen years
old or more.
Rape in the first degree is a class B felony.
130.30 Rape in the second degree.
A person is guilty of rape in the second degree when:
1. being eighteen years old or more, he or she engages in sexual
intercourse with another person less than fifteen years old; or
2. he or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person who is
incapable of consent by reason of being mentally disabled or mentally
incapacitated.
It shall be an affirmative defense to the crime of rape in the second
degree as defined in subdivision one of this section that the defendant
was less than four years older than the victim at the time of the act.
S 130.25 Rape in the third degree.
A person is guilty of rape in the third degree when:
1. He or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person who is
incapable of consent by reason of some factor other than being less than
seventeen years old;
2. Being twenty-one years old or more, he or she engages in sexual
intercourse with another person less than seventeen years old; or
3. He or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person without
such person`s consent where such lack of consent is by reason of some
factor other than incapacity to consent.
Rape in the third degree is a class E felony.
Similarly, none of the provisions covering criminal sexual conduct apply either. We have no reason to believe that Nash does not consent to the relationship and he is of age (he was seventeen and is now eighteen). Nor can his mother object to his working as a model. He cannot void his modeling contract, since he seems to have entered into it as an adult (although it's not clear from the episode when he turned eighteen; if it was after he entered in the contract with the agency, he would need to enter into another contract).
Max and Caroline's continuing problem, however, is that they still don't have a talent agent's license; thus, they cannot represent Nash.
Copyright and Classics
Stephen M. Maurer, University of California, Berkeley, has published The Economics of Memory: How Copyright Decides Which Books Do (and Don’t) Become Classics. Here is the abstract.
Legal scholars usually analyze copyright as an incentive and sometime obstacle to creation. This encourages us to see publishers as middlemen who siphon off rents that would be better spent on authors. By comparison, recent social science research emphasizes that word-of-mouth markets are highly imperfect. This means that many deserving titles will never find readers unless some publisher takes the trouble to market them. But this second view is deeply subversive. After all, the need for publishers – and reward – does not end when a book is published. At least in principle, copyright should last forever.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
The trouble with this argument is that it assumes what ought to be proven. How much effort do publishers really invest in finding forgotten titles? And does vigorous marketing attract more readers than high copyright prices deter? This article looks for answers in the history of 20th Century print publishers and today’s Print-on-Demand and eBook markets. We argue that, far from promoting dissemination, copyright frequently operates to suppress works that would otherwise erode the price of new titles. This pathology has gotten dramatically worse in the Age of eBooks. Meanwhile, public domain publishers are facing their own crisis. Mid-20th Century books had large up-front costs. This deterred copyists. By comparison, digital technologies make it easy for copyists to enter the market. This has suppressed profits to the point where many public domain publishers spend little or nothing on forgotten titles.
The article concludes by reviewing possible reforms. Partial solutions include clarifying antitrust law so that firms have more freedom to implement price discrimination; modifying copyright so that consumers can re-sell used eBooks; letting on-line markets limit the number of publishers allowed to post redundant public domain titles on their sites; and strengthening non-commercial institutions for finding, curating, and delivering quality titles to readers.
May 4, 2015
Wondrous Things
A number of interesting law and magic related articles from the spring 2012 issue of Lapham's Quarterly. Check out Lewis Lapham's Wonders Never Cease, on our interest in the wonderous and unusual, Colin Dickey's Very Superstitious, on the persistence of the belief in sympathetic magic, and Spellbound and Gagged, on charms and spells.
Comically Speaking
Professor Steve Jamar (Howard Law School) suggests this comic strip (I think it's called a "tier" in the terminology of comics) lets us into the world of (at least some of) our students. How about this one? Where did the house go? Some law students will enthusiastically engage in the discussion, and some think the answer's obvious. Whether or not you're a lawyer, don't engage with a feline who is concentrating on treats. Cats generally do not negotiate over noms. And here, a use for poets--figuring out what to capitalize (on) in a movie title.
More comical food for thought from website creator Randall Munroe Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.
Tip of the beret to Professor Jamar.
More comical food for thought from website creator Randall Munroe Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.
Tip of the beret to Professor Jamar.
The United States As a "Settler State"
Natsu Taylor Saito, Georgia State University College of Law, is publishing Tales of Color and Colonialism: Racial Realism and Settler Colonial Theory in volume 11 of the Florida A & M University Law Review (2015). Here is the abstract.
More than a half-century after the Civil Rights Era, people of color remain disproportionately impoverished and incarcerated, excluded and vulnerable. Legal remedies rooted in the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection remain elusive. This article argues that the “racial realism” advocated by the late Professor Derrick Bell compels us to look critically at the purposes served by racial hierarchy. By stepping outside the master narrative’s depiction of the United States as a “nation of immigrants” with opportunity for all, we can recognize it as a settler state, much like Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. It could not exist without the occupation of indigenous lands, and those lands could not be rendered profitable without imported labor. Employing settler colonial theory, this article identifies some of the strategies of elimination and/or subordination that have been — and continue to be — used to subordinate Indigenous peoples, Afrodescendants, and migrants of color in order to further settler state goals and maintain a racialized status quo. It suggests that further analysis of these strategies will help us find common ground in the diverse experiences of those deemed Other within the United States, and that exercising our internationally recognized right to self-determination — a primary tool of decolonization — may prove more effective than formal equality in dismantling structural racism.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
A New Novel With an Assertive Lawyer-Protagonist
Heller McAlpine reviews Eliza Kennedy's first novel, I Take You, for NPR. Says McAlpine in part,
More here from the publisher's website.
Kennedy, a graduate of the University of Iowa and Harvard Law School, is a former litigator herself, and married to writer Joshua Ferris. Her snappy comedy of mis-manners delights in subverting expectations, from its indictment of monogamy as unnatural to its ardent defense of lawyering and casual sex. Lily unabashedly extols her job: "Because being a lawyer is great. It's mentally engaging and competitive and fun. Work is really the only time that I feel focused." She reconsiders: "That's not true. One other thing focuses me. But I don't get paid for it." She reconsiders again. "That's not true. I got paid for it once."Read an excerpt of the book here.
More here from the publisher's website.
Call For Papers: Law, Literature and the Humanities Association of Australasia Conference, December 9-12, 2015: Extended Deadline
From Dr
Honni van Rijswijk, University of Technology, Sydney, a call for papers for the Law, Literature and the Humanities Association of Australasia Conference, 9-12 December 2015
Please note the extended deadline both for stream proposals and for paper and panel proposals: June 30, 2015
Please note the extended deadline both for stream proposals and for paper and panel proposals: June 30, 2015
Law, Literature and the Humanities Association of Australasia ConferenceUniversity of Technology Sydney Law School, Sydney, AustraliaDates: 9-12 December 2015(with 9 December as a postgraduate day)Complicity is a state of being complex or involved, and no matter where we are, or what we do, law is part of our entanglement in the world. This conference will explore law’s complex relations with culture, politics and capital. It will investigate law as an accomplice, as well as law’s role in shaping (and resisting) certain problematic moral, political and material positions.The LLH Association of Australasia invites scholarly and creative research from academics and graduate students working at the intersection of law and the humanities, whether based in legal theory or in disciplines such as literature, art, film, music, history, continental philosophy, anthropology, psychoanalysis, visual culture, or cultural studies. Contributions may take a variety of forms from traditional academic papers to poster presentations, video, or other genres or media.The conference invites consideration of the following questions:• What does complicity reveal about law’s methods and modes, its affects and effects?• How are law’s genres, narratives, processes and images complicit in the creation of particular imaginaries, materialities and practices of the everyday?• How might we work within visual, narrative, creative and textual domains and devise strategies to reveal and counter law's complicities, and acknowledge our own?We ask you to make your own interpretation of the theme ‘Complicities,’ and invite scholars from a range of disciplines to propose papers, complete panels and streams. Proposals should consist of a short abstract (max. 250 words). Please email your abstract to llh@uts.edu.au. Please include your name and the word Complicities in the subject line.Deadline for Stream Proposals: 30 June, 2015Deadline for Paper and Panel Proposals: 30 June 2015For all conference information including on-line registration, check our web site at this address: http://llh.uts.edu.auAnd for further information, contact the Co-convenors, Dr Honni van Rijswijk and Associate Professor Penny Crofts at llh@uts.edu.au
Peter Robinson On Ruth Rendell's Legacy
Peter Robinson, author of the Inspector Banks mystery novels, offers an appreciation of Ruth Rendell, here.
The Trial In the Headlines
Lawrence M. Friedman, Stanford Law School, has published The Big Trial: Law as Public Spectacle (University Press of Kansas, 2015). Here is a description of the contents from the publisher's website.
The trial of O. J. Simpson was a sensation, avidly followed by millions of people, but it was also, in a sense, nothing new. One hundred years earlier the Lizzie Borden trial had held the nation in thrall. The names (and the crimes) may change, but the appeal is enduring—and why this is, how it works, and what it means are what Lawrence Friedman investigates in The Big Trial.
What is it about these cases that captures the public imagination? Are the headline trials of our period different from those of a century or two ago? And what do we learn from them, about the nature of our society, past and present? To get a clearer picture, Friedman first identifies what certain headline trials have in common, then considers particular cases within each grouping. The political trial, for instance, embraces treason and spying, dissenters and radicals, and, to varying degrees, corruption and fraud. Celebrity trials involve the famous—whether victims, as in the case of Charles Manson, or defendants as disparate as Fatty Arbuckle and William Kennedy Smith—but certain high-profile cases, such as those Friedman categorizes as tabloid trials, can also create celebrities. The fascination of whodunit trials can be found in the mystery surrounding the case: Are we sure about O. J. Simpson? What about Claus von Bulow—tried, in another sensational case, for sending his wife into a coma.? An especially interesting type of case Friedman groups under the rubric worm in the bud. These are cases, such as that of Lizzie Borden, that seem to put society itself on trial; they raise fundamental social questions and often suggest hidden and secret pathologies. And finally, a small but important group of cases proceed from moral panic, the Salem witchcraft trials being the classic instance, though Friedman also considers recent examples.
Interpreting Magna Carta In the Courts
Robert M. Pallitto, Seton Hall University, has published In the Shadow of the Great Charter: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Magna Carta (University Press of Kansas, 2015). Here is a description of the contents from the publisher's website.
In the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling on whether Guantanamo detainees could be barred from U.S. courts, Justice Anthony Kennedy cited the U.S. Constitution, of course. But he also linked the decision to the Magna Carta. Why would a twenty-first century judge,even under the extraordinary circumstances of the "war on terror," invoke a document signed by an English king in the thirteenth century? To address this question, as Robert Pallitto does in this clarifying book, is to probe the history of modern civil liberties, and to explore the process by which judges decide individual rights cases. Pallitto's work, with its insight into competing ideas about interpreting the Constitution—"originalism" versus "constitutional common law"—is of critical importance to our understanding of the nation's founding document.
Of far more than symbolic significance, the Magna Carta exerts immediate practical influence on legal outcomes, as Justice Kennedy's opinion demonstrates. To explain this, Pallitto first goes into the Charter's origins, history, and nature, especially its explicit use of "the law of the land" to protect subjects' rights and liberty. The Magna Carta's legacy in the United States reaches back to the nation's founding, with even the colonial charters reflecting its influence. But it is in the Supreme Court's reference to the Charter, spanning the institution's full two-hundred years, that Pallitto finds the greatest impact—most frequently inthe principles of due process (in criminal proceedings) and habeas corpus, but in many other provisions as well. And the weight of this impact registers most deeply and clearly in the development of the constitutional common law—the theory that courts should and do interpret and expand on constitutional texts by reference to tradition and precedent rather than to the drafter's original intent.
May 2, 2015
Novelist Ruth Rendell Dies
Crime novelist Ruth Rendell has died, her publisher Hutchinson has announced. Ms. Rendell suffered a stroke in January and was admitted to the hospital.
Her most popular literary character is Inspector Wexford, who made his debut in the 1964 novel From Doon With Death. Her Inspector Wexford novels came to the small screen as The Ruth Rendell Mysteries (ITV, 1987-2000). Many of her other novels have also been adapted for film and tv. She also wrote thrillers under the name Barbara Vine. She was created a life peer in 1997. As a peer, she was particularly concerned about the issue of female genital mutilation (FGM).
Here 's a selected bibliography centered on Rendell's works and law.
Mieke Ball, Legal Lust: Literary Litigations, 15 Australian Feminist Law Journal 1 (2001).
Xaveria F. J. Bianto, The Polly's Actions and Reactions in Her Being Ill-Treated in Ruth Rendell The Thief (sic) (Thesis, 2013).
Lisa Kadonaga, Strange Countries and Secret Worlds in Ruth Rendell's Crime Novels,
88 Geographical Review 413 (July 1998).
Her most popular literary character is Inspector Wexford, who made his debut in the 1964 novel From Doon With Death. Her Inspector Wexford novels came to the small screen as The Ruth Rendell Mysteries (ITV, 1987-2000). Many of her other novels have also been adapted for film and tv. She also wrote thrillers under the name Barbara Vine. She was created a life peer in 1997. As a peer, she was particularly concerned about the issue of female genital mutilation (FGM).
Here 's a selected bibliography centered on Rendell's works and law.
Mieke Ball, Legal Lust: Literary Litigations, 15 Australian Feminist Law Journal 1 (2001).
Xaveria F. J. Bianto, The Polly's Actions and Reactions in Her Being Ill-Treated in Ruth Rendell The Thief (sic) (Thesis, 2013).
Lisa Kadonaga, Strange Countries and Secret Worlds in Ruth Rendell's Crime Novels,
88 Geographical Review 413 (July 1998).
May 1, 2015
Law and Poetry: Some New Collections
From Pleasure Boat Studio, two new collections of poetry:
James Clarke's The Juried Heart ($17 U.S.; $20 Can.). Judge Clarke is retired from the bench of the Superior Court of Ontario.
Lawyer Poets and That World We Call Law (James R. Elkins, ed.) ($22.50 U.S.).
James Clarke's The Juried Heart ($17 U.S.; $20 Can.). Judge Clarke is retired from the bench of the Superior Court of Ontario.
Lawyer Poets and That World We Call Law (James R. Elkins, ed.) ($22.50 U.S.).
Scandal In Fourteenth-Century England!
Paul Strohm, J.R.R. Tolkien Professor at Oxford University and the Garbedian Professor of the Humanities at Columbia University, introduces us to "whistleblower" poet and satirist John Gower (1330-1408) who wrote about fraud in the late 14th century English wool trade. It was apparently endemic, as it infected businessmen and regulators alike. More here in Professor Strohm's entertaining piece for Lapham's Quarterly.
The Age of Statutes
James R. Maxeiner, University of Baltimore School of Law, has published A Government of Laws Not of Precedents 1776-1876: The Google Challenge to Common Law Myth at 4 British Journal of American Legal Studies 141 (2015). Here is the abstract.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.
Conventional wisdom holds that the United States is a common law country of precedents where, until the 20th century (the “Age of Statutes”), statutes had little role. Digitization by Google and others of previously hard to find legal works of the 19th century challenges this common law myth. At the Centennial in 1876 Americans celebrated that “The great fact in the progress of American jurisprudence … is its tendency towards organic statute law and towards the systematizing of law; in other words, towards written constitutions and codification.” This article tests the claim of the Centennial Writers of 1876 and finds it credible.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.
April 30, 2015
Looking At Asian American Culture and Racial Classification
Jennifer Ann Ho (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) has published Racial Ambiguity in Asian American Culture (Rutgers University Press, May 2015). Here is a description of the contents from the publisher's website.
The sheer diversity of the Asian American populace makes them an ambiguous racial category. Indeed, the 2010 U.S. Census lists twenty-four Asian-ethnic groups, lumping together under one heading people with dramatically different historical backgrounds and cultures. In Racial Ambiguity in Asian American Culture, Jennifer Ann Ho shines a light on the hybrid and indeterminate aspects of race, revealing ambiguity to be paramount to a more nuanced understanding both of race and of what it means to be Asian American.Exploring a variety of subjects and cultural artifacts, Ho reveals how Asian American subjects evince a deep racial ambiguity that unmoors the concept of race from any fixed or finite understanding. For example, the book examines the racial ambiguity of Japanese American nisei Yoshiko Nakamura deLeon, who during World War II underwent an abrupt transition from being an enemy alien to an assimilating American, via the Mixed Marriage Policy of 1942. It looks at the blogs of Korean, Taiwanese, and Vietnamese Americans who were adopted as children by white American families and have conflicted feelings about their “honorary white” status. And it discusses Tiger Woods, the most famous mixed-race Asian American, whose description of himself as “Cablinasian”—reflecting his background as Black, Asian, Caucasian, and Native American—perfectly captures the ambiguity of racial classifications.Race is an abstraction that we treat as concrete, a construct that reflects only our desires, fears, and anxieties. Jennifer Ho demonstrates in Racial Ambiguity in Asian American Culture that seeing race as ambiguous puts us one step closer to a potential antidote to racism.
Labels:
Law and Race,
Race,
Racism
April 29, 2015
Frolics and Detours
The Hollywood Reporter covers a unique battle of the bands: with lawyer-musicians here. This year, the event, called Law Rocks, featured groups such as Privileged Communication (Perkins Coie), and Run DLA (DLA Piper), Attractive Nuisance (Greines Martin), and Big Dicta (Doll Amir Eley). Money raised at the event goes to charity.
Data Collection, Data Breaches, and Star Wars
Dan Solove (George Washington Law, Teach Privacy) points out that the Empire might have defeated the Rebel Alliance had it mastered data collection. Think about the data breaches in Star Wars alone. Dr. Solove also notes something that has always bothered me: Ben Kenobi is not exactly a great alias when your actual name is Obi Wan Kenobi ("this is not the Jedi Warrior named Kenobi you're looking for. Move along, move along.")
Now, Luke's sister Leia was, I believe, living under an alias: she had been adopted after her mother died in childbirth. So it's possible that the Empire (and Darth Vader) did not know who she was at the beginning of Star Wars, especially if she had a new birth certifcate and the government of Alderaan sealed her adoption records. However, Vader certainly knew who Luke was, since he lived with his uncle (Vader's brother). At any rate, an entertaining look at information privacy, data collection, and Big Data in a Very Big Film Franchise.
Now, Luke's sister Leia was, I believe, living under an alias: she had been adopted after her mother died in childbirth. So it's possible that the Empire (and Darth Vader) did not know who she was at the beginning of Star Wars, especially if she had a new birth certifcate and the government of Alderaan sealed her adoption records. However, Vader certainly knew who Luke was, since he lived with his uncle (Vader's brother). At any rate, an entertaining look at information privacy, data collection, and Big Data in a Very Big Film Franchise.
Labels:
Law and Film,
Privacy,
Star Wars
The Publishing History of "The Adventure of the Norwood Builder"
Ross E. Davies, George Mason University School of Law; The Green Bag, has published The Regulatory Adventure of the Two Norwood Builders: Sherlock Holmes Crosses Paths with Congress, the President, the Courts, and the Administrative State, in the Press at 2015 Green Bag Almanac 567.
Here is the abstract.
Here is the abstract.
It was almost certainly some combination of law on the books and law in the works that inspired the New York World to publish its 1911 version of the Sherlock Holmes story, “The Adventure of the Norwood Builder,” in not one, but two, formats. (In its Sunday editions from April 9 to July 2, 1911, the World republished the thirteen stories from The Return of Sherlock Holmes in their original sequence, with “Norwood Builder” appearing on April 16.) The law on the books was a series of interpretations of the Mail Classification Act of 1879 by the U.S. Post Office Department (in 1901) and the U.S. Supreme Court (in 1904). The law in the works was the ongoing congressional and presidential interest in tinkering with postal service in general and second-class mail rates in particular — an interest that manifested itself in 1911 in the form of hearings conducted in New York City by a special federal Postal Commission headed by Justice Charles Evans Hughes. The results were: (a) a colorful, relatively small, booklet version of “Norwood Builder” (and similar booklets of the other stories in the series) for in-town readers of the World, and (b) black-and-white, relatively large, tabloid versions of the same stories for out-of-town subscribers to the newspaper. Unfortunately, decisions by several of America’s great libraries to discard their hard copies of the World have left us (at least for now) with the rather plain tabloid version of “Norwood Builder,” but not the colorful booklet version, to share with readers of the Green Bag Almanac & Reader.Download the essay from SSRN at the link.
April 28, 2015
Motherhood, the "Fallen Woman," and Popular Culture
Janet Mason Ellerby is publishing Embroidering the Scarlet A: Unwed Mothers and Illegitimate Children in American Fiction and Film (University of Michigan, 2015). Here's a description of the contents from the publisher's website.
- See more at: http://www.press.umich.edu/6944967/embroidering_the_scarlet_a#sthash.z922XZdh.dpuf
- See more at: http://www.press.umich.edu/6944967/embroidering_the_scarlet_a#sthash.z922XZdh.dpuf
- See more at: http://www.press.umich.edu/6944967/embroidering_the_scarlet_a#sthash.z922XZdh.dpuf
- See more at: http://www.press.umich.edu/6944967/embroidering_the_scarlet_a#sthash.z922XZdh.dpuf
- See more at: http://www.press.umich.edu/6944967/embroidering_the_scarlet_a#sthash.z922XZdh.dpuf
- See more at: http://www.press.umich.edu/6944967/embroidering_the_scarlet_a#sthash.z922XZdh.dpuf
Embroidering the Scarlet A traces the evolution of the “fallen woman” from the earliest novels to recent representations in fiction and film, including The Scarlet Letter, The Sound and the Fury, The Color Purple, and Love Medicine, and the films Juno and Mother and Child. Interweaving her own experience as a pregnant teen forced to surrender her daughter and pledge secrecy for decades, Ellerby interrogates “out-of-wedlock” motherhood, mapping the ways archetypal scarlet women and their children have been exiled as social pariahs, pardoned as blameless pawns, and transformed into empowered women. Drawing on narrative, feminist, and autobiographical theory, the book examines the ways that the texts have affirmed, subverted, or challenged dominant thinking and the prevailing moral standards as they have shifted over time. Using her own life experience and her uniquely informed perspective, Ellerby assesses the effect these stories have on the lives of real women and children. By inhabiting the space where ideology meets narrative, Ellerby questions the constricting historical, cultural, and social parameters of female sexuality and permissible maternity.
As a feminist cultural critique, a moving autobiographical journey, and an historical investigation that addresses both fiction and film, Embroidering the Scarlet A will appeal to students and scholars of literature, history, sociology, psychology, women’s and gender studies, and film studies. The book will also interest general readers, as it relates the experience of surrendering a child to adoption at a time when birthmothers were still exiled, birth records were locked away, and secrecy was still mandatory. It will also appeal to those concerned with adoption or the cultural shifts that have changed our thinking about illegitimacy.
Embroidering the Scarlet A traces the evolution of the “fallen woman” from the earliest novels to recent representations in fiction and film, including The Scarlet Letter, The Sound and the Fury, The Color Purple, and Love Medicine, and the films Juno and Mother and Child.
Interweaving her own experience as a pregnant teen forced to surrender
her daughter and pledge secrecy for decades, Ellerby interrogates
“out-of-wedlock” motherhood, mapping the ways archetypal scarlet women
and their children have been exiled as social pariahs, pardoned as
blameless pawns, and transformed into empowered women. Drawing on
narrative, feminist, and autobiographical theory, the book examines the
ways that the texts have affirmed, subverted, or challenged dominant
thinking and the prevailing moral standards as they have shifted over
time. Using her own life experience and her uniquely informed
perspective, Ellerby assesses the effect these stories have on the lives
of real women and children. By inhabiting the space where ideology
meets narrative, Ellerby questions the constricting historical,
cultural, and social parameters of female sexuality and permissible
maternity.
As a feminist cultural critique, a moving autobiographical journey,
and an historical investigation that addresses both fiction and film, Embroidering the Scarlet A
will appeal to students and scholars of literature, history, sociology,
psychology, women’s and gender studies, and film studies. The book will
also interest general readers, as it relates the experience of
surrendering a child to adoption at a time when birthmothers were still
exiled, birth records were locked away, and secrecy was still mandatory.
It will also appeal to those concerned with adoption or the cultural
shifts that have changed our thinking about illegitimacy.
“Janet Ellerby brings an unusual and highly valuable voice to the
field of American literary studies as she surveys representations of
‘fallen’women, birthmothers, and their illegitimate children in American
fiction and film, as seen from a birthmother’s point of view. The
author’s personal approach–her identification with the characters and
their situations–makes for lively, fascinating, and distinctive
readings…. a significant, pathbreaking book.”
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
Illustration : “Hester Prynne & Pearl before the stocks” by Mary Hallock Foote from The Scarlet Letter, James R. Osgood & Co, 1878.
Janet Mason Ellerby is Professor of English and Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Product Details
- 6 x 9.
- 290pp.
Available for sale worldwide
- Hardcover
- 2015
- Available
- 978-0-472-07263-7
- $85.00 U.S.
- Paper
- 2015
- Available
- 978-0-472-05263-9
- $34.50 U.S.
Related Products
- Embroidering the Scarlet A
- Ebook
- 978-0-472-12105-2
- View Options
nothing
Keywords
- Unwed mother, birthmother, Birth Mother, Illegitimacy, The Scarlet Letter, Adoption, American literature, Feminist critique, American culture, American film, Fallen woman, Out-of-wedlock motherhood
nothing
nothing
Embroidering the Scarlet A traces the evolution of the “fallen woman” from the earliest novels to recent representations in fiction and film, including The Scarlet Letter, The Sound and the Fury, The Color Purple, and Love Medicine, and the films Juno and Mother and Child.
Interweaving her own experience as a pregnant teen forced to surrender
her daughter and pledge secrecy for decades, Ellerby interrogates
“out-of-wedlock” motherhood, mapping the ways archetypal scarlet women
and their children have been exiled as social pariahs, pardoned as
blameless pawns, and transformed into empowered women. Drawing on
narrative, feminist, and autobiographical theory, the book examines the
ways that the texts have affirmed, subverted, or challenged dominant
thinking and the prevailing moral standards as they have shifted over
time. Using her own life experience and her uniquely informed
perspective, Ellerby assesses the effect these stories have on the lives
of real women and children. By inhabiting the space where ideology
meets narrative, Ellerby questions the constricting historical,
cultural, and social parameters of female sexuality and permissible
maternity.
As a feminist cultural critique, a moving autobiographical journey,
and an historical investigation that addresses both fiction and film, Embroidering the Scarlet A
will appeal to students and scholars of literature, history, sociology,
psychology, women’s and gender studies, and film studies. The book will
also interest general readers, as it relates the experience of
surrendering a child to adoption at a time when birthmothers were still
exiled, birth records were locked away, and secrecy was still mandatory.
It will also appeal to those concerned with adoption or the cultural
shifts that have changed our thinking about illegitimacy.
“Janet Ellerby brings an unusual and highly valuable voice to the
field of American literary studies as she surveys representations of
‘fallen’women, birthmothers, and their illegitimate children in American
fiction and film, as seen from a birthmother’s point of view. The
author’s personal approach–her identification with the characters and
their situations–makes for lively, fascinating, and distinctive
readings…. a significant, pathbreaking book.”
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
Illustration : “Hester Prynne & Pearl before the stocks” by Mary Hallock Foote from The Scarlet Letter, James R. Osgood & Co, 1878.
Janet Mason Ellerby is Professor of English and Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Product Details
- 6 x 9.
- 290pp.
Available for sale worldwide
- Hardcover
- 2015
- Available
- 978-0-472-07263-7
- $85.00 U.S.
- Paper
- 2015
- Available
- 978-0-472-05263-9
- $34.50 U.S.
Related Products
- Embroidering the Scarlet A
- Ebook
- 978-0-472-12105-2
- View Options
nothing
Keywords
- Unwed mother, birthmother, Birth Mother, Illegitimacy, The Scarlet Letter, Adoption, American literature, Feminist critique, American culture, American film, Fallen woman, Out-of-wedlock motherhood
nothing
nothing
Subjects
- Literary Studies - American Literature
- Media and Communication
- Gender Studies - Women's Studies
- Psychology
BISAC Categories
Embroidering the Scarlet A
Unwed Mothers and Illegitimate Children in American Fiction and Film
Janet Mason Ellerby
The first book-length study of changing cultural representations of unwed mothers in American fiction and film, from The Scarlet Letter to Juno
Description
Embroidering the Scarlet A traces the evolution of the “fallen woman” from the earliest novels to recent representations in fiction and film, including The Scarlet Letter, The Sound and the Fury, The Color Purple, and Love Medicine, and the films Juno and Mother and Child.
Interweaving her own experience as a pregnant teen forced to surrender
her daughter and pledge secrecy for decades, Ellerby interrogates
“out-of-wedlock” motherhood, mapping the ways archetypal scarlet women
and their children have been exiled as social pariahs, pardoned as
blameless pawns, and transformed into empowered women. Drawing on
narrative, feminist, and autobiographical theory, the book examines the
ways that the texts have affirmed, subverted, or challenged dominant
thinking and the prevailing moral standards as they have shifted over
time. Using her own life experience and her uniquely informed
perspective, Ellerby assesses the effect these stories have on the lives
of real women and children. By inhabiting the space where ideology
meets narrative, Ellerby questions the constricting historical,
cultural, and social parameters of female sexuality and permissible
maternity.
As a feminist cultural critique, a moving autobiographical journey,
and an historical investigation that addresses both fiction and film, Embroidering the Scarlet A
will appeal to students and scholars of literature, history, sociology,
psychology, women’s and gender studies, and film studies. The book will
also interest general readers, as it relates the experience of
surrendering a child to adoption at a time when birthmothers were still
exiled, birth records were locked away, and secrecy was still mandatory.
It will also appeal to those concerned with adoption or the cultural
shifts that have changed our thinking about illegitimacy.
“Janet Ellerby brings an unusual and highly valuable voice to the
field of American literary studies as she surveys representations of
‘fallen’women, birthmothers, and their illegitimate children in American
fiction and film, as seen from a birthmother’s point of view. The
author’s personal approach–her identification with the characters and
their situations–makes for lively, fascinating, and distinctive
readings…. a significant, pathbreaking book.”
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
Subjects
- Literary Studies - American Literature
- Media and Communication
- Gender Studies - Women's Studies
- Psychology
BISAC Categories
Embroidering the Scarlet A
Unwed Mothers and Illegitimate Children in American Fiction and Film
Janet Mason Ellerby
The first book-length study of changing cultural representations of unwed mothers in American fiction and film, from The Scarlet Letter to Juno
Description
Embroidering the Scarlet A traces the evolution of the “fallen woman” from the earliest novels to recent representations in fiction and film, including The Scarlet Letter, The Sound and the Fury, The Color Purple, and Love Medicine, and the films Juno and Mother and Child.
Interweaving her own experience as a pregnant teen forced to surrender
her daughter and pledge secrecy for decades, Ellerby interrogates
“out-of-wedlock” motherhood, mapping the ways archetypal scarlet women
and their children have been exiled as social pariahs, pardoned as
blameless pawns, and transformed into empowered women. Drawing on
narrative, feminist, and autobiographical theory, the book examines the
ways that the texts have affirmed, subverted, or challenged dominant
thinking and the prevailing moral standards as they have shifted over
time. Using her own life experience and her uniquely informed
perspective, Ellerby assesses the effect these stories have on the lives
of real women and children. By inhabiting the space where ideology
meets narrative, Ellerby questions the constricting historical,
cultural, and social parameters of female sexuality and permissible
maternity.
As a feminist cultural critique, a moving autobiographical journey,
and an historical investigation that addresses both fiction and film, Embroidering the Scarlet A
will appeal to students and scholars of literature, history, sociology,
psychology, women’s and gender studies, and film studies. The book will
also interest general readers, as it relates the experience of
surrendering a child to adoption at a time when birthmothers were still
exiled, birth records were locked away, and secrecy was still mandatory.
It will also appeal to those concerned with adoption or the cultural
shifts that have changed our thinking about illegitimacy.
“Janet Ellerby brings an unusual and highly valuable voice to the
field of American literary studies as she surveys representations of
‘fallen’women, birthmothers, and their illegitimate children in American
fiction and film, as seen from a birthmother’s point of view. The
author’s personal approach–her identification with the characters and
their situations–makes for lively, fascinating, and distinctive
readings…. a significant, pathbreaking book.”
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
Subjects
- Literary Studies - American Literature
- Media and Communication
- Gender Studies - Women's Studies
- Psychology
BISAC Categories
Embroidering the Scarlet A
Unwed Mothers and Illegitimate Children in American Fiction and Film
Janet Mason Ellerby
The first book-length study of changing cultural representations of unwed mothers in American fiction and film, from The Scarlet Letter to Juno
Description
Embroidering the Scarlet A traces the evolution of the “fallen woman” from the earliest novels to recent representations in fiction and film, including The Scarlet Letter, The Sound and the Fury, The Color Purple, and Love Medicine, and the films Juno and Mother and Child.
Interweaving her own experience as a pregnant teen forced to surrender
her daughter and pledge secrecy for decades, Ellerby interrogates
“out-of-wedlock” motherhood, mapping the ways archetypal scarlet women
and their children have been exiled as social pariahs, pardoned as
blameless pawns, and transformed into empowered women. Drawing on
narrative, feminist, and autobiographical theory, the book examines the
ways that the texts have affirmed, subverted, or challenged dominant
thinking and the prevailing moral standards as they have shifted over
time. Using her own life experience and her uniquely informed
perspective, Ellerby assesses the effect these stories have on the lives
of real women and children. By inhabiting the space where ideology
meets narrative, Ellerby questions the constricting historical,
cultural, and social parameters of female sexuality and permissible
maternity.
As a feminist cultural critique, a moving autobiographical journey,
and an historical investigation that addresses both fiction and film, Embroidering the Scarlet A
will appeal to students and scholars of literature, history, sociology,
psychology, women’s and gender studies, and film studies. The book will
also interest general readers, as it relates the experience of
surrendering a child to adoption at a time when birthmothers were still
exiled, birth records were locked away, and secrecy was still mandatory.
It will also appeal to those concerned with adoption or the cultural
shifts that have changed our thinking about illegitimacy.
“Janet Ellerby brings an unusual and highly valuable voice to the
field of American literary studies as she surveys representations of
‘fallen’women, birthmothers, and their illegitimate children in American
fiction and film, as seen from a birthmother’s point of view. The
author’s personal approach–her identification with the characters and
their situations–makes for lively, fascinating, and distinctive
readings…. a significant, pathbreaking book.”
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
— Margaret Homans, Yale University, author of The Imprint of Another Life: Adoption Narratives and Human Possibility
Subjects
- Literary Studies - American Literature
- Media and Communication
- Gender Studies - Women's Studies
- Psychology
BISAC Categories
Embroidering the Scarlet A
Unwed Mothers and Illegitimate Children in American Fiction and Film
Janet Mason Ellerby
Embroidering the Scarlet A
Unwed Mothers and Illegitimate Children in American Fiction and Film
Janet Mason Ellerby
- See more at: http://www.press.umich.edu/6944967/embroidering_the_scarlet_a#sthash.z922XZdh.dpuf
Labels:
Adoption,
Domestic Relations Law,
Illegitimacy,
Juno,
Law and Feminism,
Law and Film,
Law and Literature,
Law and Narrative,
Nathaniel Hawthorne,
The Scarlet Letter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)