Showing posts with label Philip K. Dick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philip K. Dick. Show all posts

May 22, 2026

Solove on Dangerous Oracles: Minority Report, and AI Predictions

Daniel Solove, George Washington University Law School, has published Dangerous Oracles: Minority Report, Philip K. Dick, and AI Predictions at his Substack. Here is the first paragraph of his essay.

AI predictions (or more generally known as algorithmic predictions), are becoming increasingly common. As applied to human behavior, AI predictions are deeply problematic. It’s hard to imagine a discussion about AI predictions of human behavior that doesn’t reference Minority Report. The 2002 movie by Stephen Spielberg adapts a 1956 story, “The Minority Report” by Philip K. Dick. Both of these works contribute significantly to the debate about the ethics of AI predictions of human behavior.
Download the entire essay at the link.

May 26, 2015

From Dracula To Blade Runner

Sarah Marshall discusses the history and influence of Bram Stoker's Dracula here for Lapham's Quarterly.   Ms. Marshall compares the Dracula story and the immigrant narrative, but I think it also prefigures the alien invasion narrative, in which the invader takes on the coloration and the habits of the locals and blends in so successfully that they believe they cannot defeat him.

After his emigration on the doomed Demeter, Dracula terrorizes the novel’s narrators not just by his predation of their women, but by his mastery of English accent and mannerisms, and his accrual of English property. Yet he has made this desire for complete absorption into English life clear from the beginning: in one of the book’s most telling and oddly poignant moments, Jonathan Harker enters Dracula’s study and finds him “lying on the sofa, reading, of all things in the world, and English Bradshaw’s Guide”—a railway timetable.

Dracula’s obsession with mastering even the most inconsequential habits of English life, and his almost solicitous insistence on his own incompetence as a counterfeit Englishman, tinges his villainy with something both more complicated and more commonplace than horror: Dracula is a supernatural potboiler, but it is also an immigrant’s story. In Dracula’s desire to master his adopted tongue, we can find evidence of his sinister dissembly, but we can also, if we wish to, envision a rather more endearing figure, and a deeply human one. Stoker’s Count is a man casting off the caul of an inhospitable homeland, seeking acceptance in a new country by following its demands, and becoming—as the saying would later go—more English than the English.
Surely this kind of "dissembly" as Ms. Marshall puts it is the stuff of enduring sf terror, as we find it in such films as The Thing, I Married a Monster From Outer Space, and Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and their various remakes, as well as works by Philip K. Dick and other masters, in which we cannot tell the "real humans" from the android "imposters."  Keep watching the skies, the ships, the pods, the replicants, your dreams...

June 1, 2011

Pre-Empting Crimes and Civil Rights In Fact and Fiction

Mark Niles, Seattle University School of Law, has published Preempting Justice: 'Precrime' in Fiction and in Fact, in volume 9 of the Seattle Journal for Social Justice (2010). Here is the abstract.


Immediately after the September 11 attacks, the United States government took a significant turn in the focus of its domestic law enforcement and international security policy from investigating crimes and pursuing criminals to preventing potential criminal acts. This focus on preventing future acts raises serious practical, legal and moral questions: What mechanism will government officials use to make these predictions of future threats and what will ensure the reliability of these predictions? What punishment or sanction, if any, is appropriate when it is determined that someone would have committed a harmful act but is apprehended (or otherwise derailed) before they have the chance to do so?



Dean Niles' lecture addresses these and other questions with an analysis of Philip K. Dick's 1956 science fiction short story "The Minority Report," and Steven Spielberg's 2002 film "Minority Report," in which a near future law enforcement agency relies on predictions to incarcerate potential criminals before they are able to commit their crimes. The analysis of these stories, of the assumptions involved in both, and of some very different structures and conclusions in the two texts suggests something about the authors and the different times when they were produced. It will cast light on the current societal response to ongoing pre-emptive incarcerations in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere and provide a basis for discussion of the proper role, if any, that "pre-emptive justice" can play in this or any society.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.