Herman and Prosenečki on Dads Over Lovers: Why Western Games Favour Parental Relationships Over Romantic Ones, Unlike Other Forms of Art @goteborgsuni

Zoryana Herman and Fabijan Prosenečki, both of the University of Gothenberg, have published Dads Over Lovers: Why Do Western Games Favour Parental Relationships Over Romantic Ones, Unlike Other Forms of Art? Here is the abstract.

Romantic relationships have long been central to various art forms. However, in recent years, Western video games have shifted toward emphasizing parental relationships, particularly father-daughter dynamics, a trend dubbed "the daddification of games." While this shift is often praised for adding emotional depth and maturity to gaming narratives, some critics argue it reinforces traditional gender roles and caters to an aging, male-dominated demographic. This study aims to explore the origins and implications of this trend in Western games and examine the potential consequences of shifting toward romance as the primary narrative focus, aligning gaming with other artistic media. By analyzing the historical evolution and current state of video game narratives, as well as the representation of relationships in past and current media, we propose how this trend was influenced by Western culture around masculinity-specifically linking emotion to femininity-American censorship, and xenophobic attitudes toward Japanese media, where romancedriven narratives are more common. Furthermore, an analysis of player discussions in online forums suggests that players are open to a broader range of relational dynamics, with potential benefits for cultural representation and diversity of experiences offered by the gaming industry.

Download the article from SSRN at the link.

CFP: Playing Law: A Jurisprudence of Video Games and Virtual Realities @dalefmitchell @usceduau

Playing Law: A Jurisprudence of Video Games and Virtual Realities

deadline for submissions: 

February 14, 2020

full name / name of organization: 

Dale Mitchell

contact email: 

dmitchell@usc.edu.au

Law is the ultimate multiplayer role-playing game. Through law, individuals are characterised, subject-object relations are constructed and enforced, and concepts of worth and identity are founded. Playing Law seeks to showcase the power of play and the boundless potential of the video game as a medium capable of facilitating experiences which unlock the next level of jurisprudential evolution. This is not only true of games which require players to act as legal characters, but is true of all games which involve the player-avatar – a subject confined in a codified space. This edited collection seeks to explore the intersection between the coded realm of the video game and the equally codified space of law. Featuring critical readings of video games as a means of understanding law and justice, this book highlights the power of playing jurisprudentially.

In the realm of the digital game space, players simulate, relate and engage with environments and experiences shaped by legality. In these interactive environments, players are not static – they are forced to be law enforcers (LA Noire; Battlefield Hardline; Super Mario Bros), compelled to be vigilantes (Grand Theft Auto; Batman: Arkham Knight; Watch Dogs), or otherwise made to follow the rules of the game. Whether it is the most simplistic puzzle game (Tetris; Snake; Pacman) or a massive open world role-playing adventure (The Elder Scrolls: Skyrim; Red Dead Redemption 2; The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild), the player must engage with the law of this interactive space – the codified rules of the game maker and the imagined legality given form in the gameworld. Even in games where the player may “choose their own path” (Life is Strange; The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt; Infamous: Second Son), the illusion of freedom is naturally limited by the dominion of the creator. In this sense, video games reflect the pervasive power and limitless influence of law itself.

We welcome all submissions which use video games as a serious means of evaluating, critiquing and exploring questions of law, legality and jurisprudence. Analysis of the video game is not limited to the narrative or ludological form itself, but can be extended to the means through which the game is played and particularities of the video game medium. For example, peripheral aspects of the video game could include controllers, cutscenes, aesthetics, genre, design, easter eggs, microtransactions, music, and transmedial artefacts that assist in the creation of the gamespace. To be clear, submissions should focus not on the way video games are regulated by law, but rather encourage legal and jurisprudential analysis of the law as captured, represented, or imbued within the game itself.

Potential themes could include, but are in no way limited to, the following:

• Representations of Law and Justice in Video Games
• Playing Right: Obedience and the Figure of the Law Enforcer
• Playing Wrong: Cheating, Mods, and the Figure of the Criminal
• Action and Passivity: Agency, Choice and Witnessing in Video Games
• Law as Video Games: Algorithm, Code and Biopolitics
• Playing Yourself: Subject, Identity and Personhood through the Coded Avatar
• Consequences and Death: Permadeath, 1-Ups, Respawn
• Performing Subversion with Gender, Sexuality, Race and Body
• Games with an Agenda: Advocacy through Video Games
• The Role of Lore, Art, Design, Aesthetic, Nostalgia and Sound in Constructing Game Spaces
• Materiality and Medium: Controller and Control, Genre and Form.
• The Gamification of Law: Serious Games, Learning the Law and Law Enforcement

Timeline

• Submissions (500-word abstract and 1-page brief CV) by February 14, 2020
• Notification of acceptance by February 28, 2020
• Draft Chapter for Peer Review by 1 July 2020
• Anticipated Publication by Early 2021

All full chapter submissions will be subject to a double-blind peer review process.

How to submit

Contributors should submit a 500-word abstract and a 1-page brief CV to playinglawbook@gmail.com by February 14, 2020.

[Thanks to the University of Pennsylvania Department of English for posting the original CFP]

Guerra-Pujol on Bargaining and Betrayal in "Breaking Bad"

Enrique Guerra-Pujol, University of Central Florida and Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, has published So Long Suckers: Bargaining and Betrayal in Breaking Bad. Here is the abstract.

This short paper explores a number of commonalities between the bargaining game "So Long Sucker" and the critically acclaimed TV series "Breaking Bad". In brief, "So Long Sucker" has been variously described as "a dog-eat-dog world" (Anatol Rapoport), "vicious" (William Poundstone), "anti-chess" (D. Graham Burnett), and "fiendish" (Peter Tannenbaum). That these dire terms equally describe the meth underworld as depicted in Breaking Bad is no coincidence, for the game "So Long Sucker" and the meth trade in Breaking Bad both share a number of commonalities. In both worlds agreements are unenforceable; double crosses, recurrent; victory, elusive. Moreover, these commonalities raise deeper questions about the nature of morality in such a "society of ruffians," questions we explore in the conclusion of this paper.

Download the article from SSRN at the link.