This study delves into the intricate succession landscape surrounding the medieval title of Prince of Achaea and the older associated dignity of King and Despot of Asia Minor, tracing their historical roots, and assessing its contemporary status if ever reclaimed by the Damalas family, senior direct-line heirs to the Genoese Zaccaria dynasty, last sovereign house to have used it as rulers of Achaea. The multidisciplinary research method used incorporates reviewing recent genealogical studies, analyzing historical sources and medieval accounts, like the Chronicles of the Morea and the Chronicle of the Tocco, to establish the title's nature, antiquity and succession history, and applying historical Roman, Byzantine and Frankish Greek feudal law (the Assizes of Romania, in particular) to assess the legitimacy of competing claims for the title over time, particularly within the Zaccaria family and later by the Tocco lineage, and ultimately of modern comparative nobiliary law and elements of private law to discuss its theoretical rehabilitation in favor of the Damalas descendants of the Zaccaria Princes of Achaea.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
November 25, 2024
Silva on Achaean Disputes: Eight Centuries of Succession Conflicts for the Title of Prince of Achaea @CathULaw
Ugo Stefano Stornaiolo Silva, Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law; University of Orleans, Faculty of Law and Economics; Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Faculty of Law and Administration, Students; Mises Institute; has published Achaean Disputes: Eight Centuries of Succession Conflicts for the Title of Prince of Achaea. Here is the abstract.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment