I argue that the three strongest arguments against metaphysical libertarianism—the randomness objection, the constitutive luck objection, and the physicalist objection—are actually unsuccessful and therefore that metaphysical libertarianism is more plausible than the common philosophical wisdom allows. My more positive thesis, what I will refer to as “Agent Exceptionalism,” is that, when making decisions and performing actions, human beings can indeed satisfy the four conditions of metaphysical libertarianism: the control condition, the rationality condition, the ultimacy condition, and the physicalism condition.Download the article from SSRN at the link.
July 31, 2023
Levy on Three Arguments Against Metaphysical Libertarianism @KenLevy2020 @LSULawCenter @LSULawProfs
Ken Levy, Louisiana State University Law Center, has published On Three Arguments Against Metaphysical Libertarianism at 76 Review of Metaphysics 725 (June 2023). Here is the abstract.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment