From the email box:
Prison Abolition, Human Rights, and Penal
Reform:
From the Local to the Global
Mass
incarceration and overcriminalization in the United States are subject to
critique by some on both the right and the left today. Many critics
increasingly talk of prison abolition. At the same time, the international
human rights movement continues to rely upon criminal punishment as its primary
enforcement tool for many violations, even as it criticizes harsh prison
conditions, the use of the death penalty, and lack of due process in criminal
proceedings. What would it mean for the human rights movement to take seriously
calls for prison abolitionism and the economic and racial inequalities that
overcriminalization reproduces and exacerbates? And what might critics of the
carceral regime in the United States have to learn from work done by international
human rights advocates in a variety of countries?
September
26-28th, 2019,
the Rapoport Center will host in Austin an interdisciplinary conference to
consider the relationships among the human rights, prison abolition, and penal
reform movements. Do they share the same goals? Should they collaborate? If so,
in what ways? The conference is co-sponsored by the Frances Tarlton “Sissy”
Farenthold Endowed Lecture Series in Peace, Social Justice and Human Rights,
Center for European Studies, William Wayne Justice Center for Public Interest
Law, LLILAS Benson Latin American Studies and Collections, John Warfield Center
for African and African American Studies, Center for the Study of Race and
Democracy, Department of Sociology, Center for Population Research, and Capital
Punishment Center.
Ruth
Wilson Gilmore will
offer the keynote lecture on September 26. We invite proposals for papers,
panels, art, or other forms of presentation from activists, practitioners, and
scholars in all disciplines. We are eager to include those who study or
advocate around criminal law and human rights in different regions and
contexts, those who work on various forms of incarceration (including
immigration detention), and those who explore alternatives to current criminal
punishment regimes. We encourage discussion of the distributive effects of
various constructions of and responses to crime. Topics might include:
- Racial
capitalism and prison abolition
- Prison
abolition: short- versus long-term goals
- Abolition
and efforts to reform/transform conditions of confinement: are they in
opposition?
- Capital
punishment, human rights, and the goals of death penalty abolition
- Mass
incarceration and surveillance
- Gender,
sexuality, reproductive rights and the prison system
- Human
rights and decriminalization
- The
human rights movement and national and international criminal law
- Lessons
from transitional and restorative justice
- Incarceration
and the intersections of criminal and immigration law
- Immigration
detention and the (private) prison industrial complex
- Potential
responses to violent crime
- The UN
and crime
- Exportation
of criminal justice models: good and bad
- The
role of victims in carceral regimes and anti-carceral responses
- Reflections
on the role human rights courts do and should play in the carceral state
- Black
Lives Matter, human rights, and abolition
- Queer
politics and abolition
Please
send an abstract of your paper, panel, or project in under 500 words to Sarah Eliason by July 15, 2019. A limited number of
need-based travel grants are available to support travel costs for selected
participants. If you wish to apply for a travel grant, please complete this
application form by July 15, 2019.
No comments:
Post a Comment