Daniel M. Brinks, University of Texas, Austin, School of Law, Varun Gauri, World Bank Development Research Group, and Kyle Shen, University of Texas School of Law, have published Social Rights Constitutionalism: Negotiating the Tension between the Universal and the Particular at 11 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 289 (2015). Here is the abstract.
The increasing importance of social rights language in constitutional texts and in the politics of social provision and human security has triggered a voluminous academic literature. Despite its global origins, we argue, social rights language goes through a process of vernacularization, through which it transforms and is transformed by local politics. The process begins when particular rights are included in constitutional texts and continues when local groups take hold of that language to express their particular aspirations. The struggle to realize social rights is a political one, grounded in and pursued through local structures of demand. In the course of that struggle, rights acquire local particularities. At the same time, the global origins and universal language of rights can open possibilities for subordinate groups to challenge the status quo. Whether or not social rights constitutionalism in the end improves the situation for these groups or simply reinforces the status quo depends on the outcome of this vernacularization process, rather than on any a priori features of social rights language or social constitutionalism.The full text is not available from SSRN.