From James Martel, President of ASLCH: (message edited)
Register for the conference at
NOTE: If you haven't registered at all you can register now in one step instead of two. Note that our program is being created from existing applications so if you are new, please send me directly anything you propose to do (be a chair, discussant or even a late add on panelist) directly. My email is firstname.lastname@example.org. I'll update the program accordingly.
I have appended the call for papers and information about hotels below. Welcome and see you all in Charlottesville!
Here, once again is the Call for papers:
The Politics of Law and the Humanities: Crisis, Austerity, Instrumentalism
How will law and the humanities scholarship fare against the pressure of the science and technology paradigm that has now permeated the institutional frameworks of academia? Will it mime the general humanities and, as suggested by the defeatist pomp of many national "crisis reports", merely retreat to its traditional position as the well-mannered guardian of liberal values? Will law and the humanities scholarship be subsumed under the science paradigm's instrumental ethos by either taking on aims and objectives sanctioned by government policies or by domesticating its own political potential to address those very same policies? Or can we imagine more salutary alternatives to defeatism and instrumental subsumption?
The terrain is well known. The ongoing economic crisis has engendered a worldwide decline in funding for research in the humanities showing sharp decreases between 2009 and 2012 with funds almost cut in half each year. The global trend is also detectable at national levels, with growing gaps between public investment into STEM subjects and the humanities. But the changes do not merely concern the fiscal prioritization of diminishing resources. The social sciences, including law, are under constant political pressure as lawmakers question the value of curiosity-driven basic research. This pressure is then mirrored at the institutional level of individual law schools emphasizing their vocational remits at the expense of research and scholarship. And this research and scholarship is itself increasingly cast in reformist, practical, and "policy relevant" terms, and directed to issues of perceived topical and regulatory concern.
The implied allegation is simple enough: basic research in the humanities and social sciences is, if not obsolete, then at least a luxury we can't afford in these times; because it cannot satisfy the more immediate needs of market-driven societies in the current economic climate, it is politically irrelevant.
But can we imagine new ways to claim - or, perhaps, to reclaim - our political relevance? Are we relevant in other, perhaps more radical ways? And if we are, how? Is there a politics that is specific to law and the humanities? Or can we articulate the limits to the conversation about "relevance" in a way accessible to minds focused on instrumentality? How might we respond to our critics, or do we ignore them?
Participants are encouraged to reflect on this broad, but not exclusive, conference theme.
In addition to sessions that connect to the theme, examples of other types of sessions we expect to organize include: History, Memory and Law; Reading Race; Law and Literature; Human Rights and Cultural Pluralism; Speech, Silence, and the Language of Law; Judgment, Justice, and Law; Beyond Identity; The Idea of Practice in Legal Thought; Metaphor and Meaning; Representing Legality in Film and Mass Media; Anarchy, Liberty and Law; What is Excellence in Interpretation?; Ethics, Religion, and Law; Moral Obligation and Legal Life; The Post-Colonial in Literary and Legal Study; Processes and Possibilities in Interdisciplinary Law Teaching.
We urge those interested in attending to consider submitting complete panels, and we hope to encourage a variety of formats-roundtables, sessions at which everyone reads the papers in advance, sessions in which commentators respond to a single paper. We invite proposals for session in which the focus is on pedagogy or methodology, for author-meets-readers sessions organized around important books in the field, or for sessions in which participants focus on performance (theatrical, filmic, musical, poetic).
I'm also reposting information about hotels:
We have reserved rooms in three Charlottesville hotels. The main conference hotel, where we have reserved 80 rooms, is Hyatt Place, a brand-new hotel. It is a short drive from the Law School, and they have a shuttle service. The rate we negotiated is $139/night plus tax. To reserve, call +1 434 426 4428 and state that you are a part of the ASLCH. You must reserve a room in Hyatt Place by Sunday, February 9.
For those of you who would rather be walking distance from the law school, we have reserved 30 rooms at the Inn at Darden, a hotel owned and operated by UVA's Darden School of Business, about a 5-minute walk from the law school. To reserve a room there, call +1 434 243 5000 or, if in the US, 1-434-243-5000 and state that you are a part of ASLCH. The rate for the room is $135/night plus tax. You will need to reserve a room by Saturday, February 1.
In case both of these hotels fill, we have also reserved 30 rooms at the Courtyard Marriott University. It is a short drive from the Law School, and if enough participants are staying there, we may be able to run a bus to the conference. To reserve a room online, please go to www.marriott.com/chodt<http://www.marriott.com/chodt> and use the booking code ASLASLA or ASLASLB. You can also call +1 434 977 1700 and state that you are a part of ASLCH. The room rate is $169/night plus tax. You will need to reserve a room by Sunday, February 9.
If you have any questions you can email the hotel managers directly at these addresses:
Hyatt Place: Sheleigha Early (email@example.com<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>)
Inn at Darden: Bridget Merker (email@example.com<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>)
Courtyard Marriot: Alex Jobin (Alex.Jobin@crestlinehotels.com<mailto:Alex.Jobin@crestlinehotels.com>)