From the mailbox:
Call for Papers
Spring
2018 Special Issue: Law and Literature from the Global South
Guest
Editors: David Babcock (James Madison University) and Peter Leman (Brigham
Young University)
Deadline
for Submissions (approximately 4,000-5,000 words): December
20, 2016
The
editors of this special issue of JCPCS seek essays that respond to the
question: what does it mean to study law and literature from the global south? “Law and
Literature,” as a field, has responded in recent years to criticism of its
longstanding attention to Anglo-American contexts, and more and more, scholars
are turning to regions of the global south in thinking about the literary in
relationship to international, colonial, and post-colonial forms of law. Though
this widening geographical scope is praiseworthy and necessary, there remains
the question of method: can the literatures and legal cultures of the global south
inflect, augment, or otherwise reshape not only where we direct our critical attention as scholars of law and
literature but how?
In posing this
question, we take as initial inspiration Jean Comaroff and John L. Comaroff’s Theory
From the South (2012), in
which they question the tendency of theory work to be unidirectional, emerging
from the north and then circulating within and being “applied to” the south.
If, however, the global south has played an essential role in “world-historical
processes” (7) and can, therefore, afford “privileged insight into the workings
of the world at large” (1), then perhaps theory—including law and literature—ought
to take this into account. When we speak of “postcolonial law and literature”
or “law, literature, and the global south,” are we speaking of the conventional
critical paradigms of law and literature as it emerged from Anglo-American
contexts in the 1970s and 80s, or does the postcolonial/global open us up to
new configurations of the legal and the literary? If so, what might these
configurations look like? What new concepts emerge? Are there forms of law,
justice, obligation, harm, personhood, etc. that originate in but circulate
beyond the cultures of the global south that might provoke us to think
differently about the dominant normative assumptions of the field at large? Are
there colonial legal practices that still survive in contemporary states, and if
so, what creative concepts or images of law can we see emerging in literary
responses to these problematic legacies? In what ways has international law
been adapted, reimagined, or otherwise modified in its years of deployment
throughout the global south—for good or for ill—that can be understood through
the lens of the literary and brought back to our conventional assumptions about
law as it has developed in the north? Are there forms of intersection between
law and literature in the global south that make even the implied distinction of
“and” irrelevant? Submissions
should seek to demonstrate how the literatures and cultures of the global south,
broadly conceived, offer provocative ways for scholars throughout the world to
think about the field of law and literature and the fluid nature of its most
fundamental terms.
Manuscripts
must be written in English and follow the MLA Style Manual. JCPCS uses a
double-blind review process. Full, formatted manuscripts should be submitted to
jcpcs.lawlit@gmail.com by December 20, 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment